Schiedam Asylum Centre Plans Collapse as Building Deemed Technically Unsuitable

Schiedam Asylum Centre Plans Collapse as Building Deemed Technically Unsuitable

2026-04-23 facilities

Schiedam, 23 April 2026
The Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers has rejected the Torendijk office building in Schiedam for housing asylum seekers, citing poor technical conditions that make sustainable accommodation impossible. This setback forces the municipality back to square one in finding accommodation for 275 asylum seekers, with current temporary housing on two ships extended until July 2027. The decision has pleased local business owners who feared property values would drop by 30%, whilst political negotiations for alternative locations await the formation of a new municipal coalition.

Technical Rejection Ends Months of Planning

The Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (COA) informed Schiedam municipality on 21 April 2026 that the Torendijk office building could not be utilised for asylum seeker accommodation [1]. In its formal communication, the COA stated that the building ‘is in too poor a technical condition to realise sustainable accommodation’ [1]. This decisive rejection came after a feasibility study revealed insurmountable structural problems, though the COA has not provided specific details about the technical deficiencies to municipal authorities [2]. Mayor Harald Bergmann expressed frustration at the lack of transparency, stating: ‘They have their own standards to assess what is feasible. I have received no further communications about this, other than the letter in which they indicate that it will not proceed’ [2].

Political Timeline and Decision-Making Process

The Torendijk location was originally designated by Schiedam’s municipal council on 7 October 2025 as the intended site for an asylum seeker centre [1]. During a closed council session in October, the proposal was approved with a substantial majority of 21 votes in favour and 13 against [3]. The council simultaneously identified the Weideveld area between ‘s-Gravelandseweg and Thurlede as an alternative location should the primary site prove unsuitable [1]. The building was one of twenty potential locations being considered for accommodating 275 asylum seekers, though the municipality has not disclosed the other eighteen sites under evaluation [3].

Current Housing Situation and Future Plans

Schiedam currently houses 146 asylum seekers on two ships moored at Buitenhavenweg, serving as temporary accommodation [3][4]. This emergency housing arrangement has been extended until 1 July 2027, providing breathing room whilst authorities search for permanent solutions [3]. With the Torendijk rejection, attention has shifted back to the alternative Weideveld location, though the current municipal administration has committed to making no irreversible decisions regarding asylum accommodation until a new coalition government is formed [1]. Political negotiations are ongoing under the guidance of informateur Renske Leijten, involving GroenLinks-PvdA-Progressief Schiedam (8 seats), Alles voor Schiedam (5 seats), DENK (4 seats), and VVD (4 seats) [3]. These coalition talks are scheduled to resume after King’s Day on 27 April 2026 [4].

Local Business Response and Economic Concerns

The rejection has been welcomed by local business owners in the ‘s-Gravelandsepolder area, who had expressed significant concerns about the economic impact of the proposed centre. Jeroen van Waveren from the ‘s-Gravelandsepolder Business Association stated: ‘We have been vehemently against the asylum centre from the beginning. We saw that in combination with the business park as absolutely not viable. The logic was totally lacking’ [4]. Business owners had feared that property values would decrease by 30% if the centre proceeded, according to van Waveren, who added: ‘I am pleased that it is not going ahead and so are other entrepreneurs in the ‘s-Gravelandsepolder. I have already spoken to a few today and they were over the moon’ [4]. The COA will now engage in discussions with Schiedam municipality about either designating the alternative Weideveld location or identifying an entirely new site for asylum accommodation [1].

Bronnen


asylum centre municipal rejection